Estudo da atividade dos sulfatos de condroitina e glucosamina na formação de vasos sanguíneos em modelos in vitro e in vivo

Abstract

Chondroitin Sulfate (CS) and Glucosamine Sulfate (GS) are functional constituents of vertebrate tissues. GS is an amino sugar and CS is part of the glucosaminoglycans group (GAGs). Studies have suggested CS and GS to have anti-inflammatory properties, however it has also been shown that these compounds promote scarring and proliferation of fibroblasts, which express molecules important for blood vessel growth (angiogenesis). This study was aimed at evaluating the effects of CS and GS on in vitro models regarding cell viability (cytotoxicity - MTT), proliferation (BrdU incorporation) and differentiation (tubulogenesis in Matrigel support) on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC line). In vivo angiogenesis was also evaluated in (1) extraembryonic membranes of Gallus domesticus (number of chorioallantoic vessels - CAM assay and vitelinic YSM assay; and fractal geometry analysis); (2) and subcutaneous tissue of adult mice (Mus muscullus) by hemoglobin quantification (Spectroscopy) in Gelfoam implants. In the HUVEC assay, both CS and GS (1-3000 g/mL) displayed partial cytotoxic effect (~50% viability), but only in the highest tested concentrations (3000 and 1000 g/mL). It was observed that CS (3 g/mL), but not GS, promoted proliferation and tubulogenesis of HUVEC in 40% (P < 0.05) and 64% (P < 0.05), respectively, relative to control (RPMI-1640 medium). These effects did not significantly differ from the respective 28% and 53% promoted by the well known angiogenic growth factor FGF-2 (50 ng/mL). In the in vivo vasculoangiogenesis YSM assay on 2 to 4-day old embryos, GS (0.001-0.1mg/disk) and, to a lesser extent, CS (0.030-0.1mg/disk) increased the amount of vessels relative to control (P < 0.05). The effects of administration of CS and GS (0.1mg/disk) did not differ from what was observed in groups treated with 50 ng/mL FGF2. In the CAM angiogenesis assay on 6 to 8-days old embryos, again both CS and GS increased the amount of vessels relative to control, but only in concentrations as high as 2.0 mg/disk. This effect was no different from what was observed in groups treated with 50 ng/mL FGF2. The pro-angiogenic effects of CS (2 mg/disk) in embryonary angiogenesis were confirmed in the advanced angiogenesis of mice: only the group treated with CS (2 mg/implant) displayed a significant increase in the amount of blood vessels, expressed as hemoglobin content (0.52 ± 0.08g/dL), relative to control (vehicle; PBS; 0.20 ± 0.07 g/dL). This pro-angiogenic effect was no different than that of FGF2 (0.53 ± 0.1g/dL). The in vitro and in vivo results indicate the pro-angiogenic properties of CS and GS. However, CS (GAG) was the more effective compound in the tests performed. As a constituent of proteoglycans, it is suggested that CS exerts its effects by interacting with FGF and other angiogenic factors in the extracellular matrix, stabilizing the receptor, and thus positively modulating the pro-angiogenic signal in endothelial cells. While the cellular mechanisms underlying CS and GS activity demand more specific research, there is an evident potential therapeutic use for both compounds in clinical situations, such as those related to vascular discrepancy.